DOSSIERS / SIN 20 - SAGIR INVEST 20 - GMBH
← SearchExport PDF
Company dossier

SIN 20 - Sagir Invest 20 - GmbH

GERMANY · COMPANY
KYBE ID: DE-R3208_HRB13684 · R3208_HRB13684 · 1 sources
RISK SCORE31MEDIUM RISK
OverviewPeopleConnections 15Risk signals 2Sources

Key facts

active
SIN 20 - Sagir Invest 20 - GmbH
de
R3208_HRB13684
de
active
de
Leienbergstraße 24, 53783 Eitorf.
de

Connections

15 links
Shared operator — likely the same administrator
SIN 10 - Sagir Invest 10 - GmbHShared registered address · 5 share thisSagir AGShared registered address · 5 share thisSagir Al GmbHShared registered address · 5 share thisSagir PP GmbHShared registered address · 5 share thisSIAG-GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSIN 10 - Sagir Invest 10 - GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSIN 20 - Sagir Invest 20 - GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSagir Al GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSagir PP GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSIN 10 - Sagir Invest 10 - GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisH.P.S. Immobilien Handels- und Verwaltungsges.mbH.Shared officer / director · 12 share thispb Wohnen Bielefeld GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSagir Planungsbüro und Projektierungsgesellschaft mbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSagir Al GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share thisSagir PP GmbHShared officer / director · 12 share this

A shared address, domain or mail server is a lead, not a verdict — most often the same administrator (accountant / corporate-services provider), not a single group.

People with significant control

1 people
NameRoleFromSource
Cafer SagirAuthorized representative—Germany registry

Risk signals

2 matched
high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 12 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

high

Phoenix predecessor

Shares a director with a failed, near-identically-named company (SIN 20 - Sagir Invest 20 - GmbH · dissolved · name-sim 1.0) — phoenixing pattern (shed debts under a new company)

Risk journey — why 31?

2 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
+15
Phoenix predecessor
Composite risk score31/100