DOSSIERS / RHEINMAX VERWALTUNGS GMBH
← SearchExport PDF
Company dossier

RheinmaX Verwaltungs GmbH

GERMANY · COMPANY
KYBE ID: DE-R3201_HRB18762 · R3201_HRB18762 · 1 sources
RISK SCORE31MEDIUM RISK
OverviewPeopleConnections 12Risk signals 2Sources

Key facts

active
RheinmaX Verwaltungs GmbH
de
R3201_HRB18762
de
active
de
Maarstraße 96, 53227 Bonn.
de

Connections

12 links
Shared operator — likely the same administrator
RheinHaus Wohnbau Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 4 share thisRheinmaX Immobilien GmbHShared officer / director · 4 share thisDÜX Bau-Holding GmbHShared registered address · 4 share thisImpac (Deutschland) GmbHShared registered address · 4 share thisRheinHaus-GmbHShared officer / director · 4 share thisRheinmaX Immobilien GmbHShared registered address · 4 share thisTREUREAL Property Management GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisCORPUS SIREO Investment GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisLICINIUS Grundstücks-Vermietungsgesellschaft mbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisTREUREAL Property Management Düsseldorf GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisTREUREAL Accounting GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisKmR Immobilien GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share this

A shared address, domain or mail server is a lead, not a verdict — most often the same administrator (accountant / corporate-services provider), not a single group.

People with significant control

4 people
NameRoleFromSource
Norbert Doctor Webermit der Befugnis im Namen der Gesellschaft mit sich im eigen—Germany registry
Heinz - Jürgen Rodehüserofficer—Germany registry
Holger Nemitzofficer—Germany registry
Norbert Doctor Weberofficer—Germany registry

Risk signals

2 matched
high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 31 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

high

Phoenix predecessor

Shares a director with a failed, near-identically-named company (APW Verwaltungs GmbH · dissolved · name-sim 0.57) — phoenixing pattern (shed debts under a new company)

Risk journey — why 31?

2 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
+15
Phoenix predecessor
Composite risk score31/100