DOSSIERS / COELAN-VERWALTUNGS- GMBH
← SearchExport PDF
Company dossier

COELAN-Verwaltungs- GmbH

GERMANY · COMPANY
KYBE ID: DE-R2707_HRB2530 · R2707_HRB2530 · 1 sources
RISK SCORE31MEDIUM RISK
OverviewPeopleConnections 12Risk signals 2Sources

Key facts

dissolved
COELAN-Verwaltungs- GmbH
de
R2707_HRB2530
de
dissolved
de
Holländische Straße 32 - 36, 34246 Vellmar.
de

Connections

12 links
Shared operator — likely the same administrator
Kemper System Unternehmensverwaltungsgesellschaft mbHShared registered address · 2 share thisSEDICO Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 3 share thisSEDICO Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 3 share thisVeit GmbH & Co. Holding KGShared officer / director · 5 share thisVeit GmbHShared officer / director · 5 share thisBrisay-Maschinen GmbHShared officer / director · 5 share thisCOELAN-Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 5 share thisREMA TIP TOP West GmbHShared officer / director · 6 share thisTip Top Oberflächenschutz Elbe GmbHShared officer / director · 6 share thisKemper System Unternehmensverwaltungsgesellschaft mbHShared officer / director · 6 share thisREMA TIP TOP West GmbHShared officer / director · 6 share thisKemper System Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 6 share this

A shared address, domain or mail server is a lead, not a verdict — most often the same administrator (accountant / corporate-services provider), not a single group.

People with significant control

5 people
NameRoleFromSource
Jochen Hunkemöllerofficer—Germany registry
Manfred Gotthartofficer—Germany registry
Marc Ludwig Baberuxkiofficer—Germany registry
Richard Sattlerofficer—Germany registry
Udo Wiehenkampofficer—Germany registry

Risk signals

2 matched
high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 20 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

high

Phoenix predecessor

Shares a director with a failed, near-identically-named company (COELAN-Verwaltungs-GmbH · dissolved · name-sim 1.0) — phoenixing pattern (shed debts under a new company)

Risk journey — why 31?

2 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
+15
Phoenix predecessor
Composite risk score31/100