DOSSIERS / HGT VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
← SearchExport PDF
Company dossier

HGT Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

GERMANY · COMPANY
KYBE ID: DE-R2103_HRB7783 · R2103_HRB7783 · 1 sources
RISK SCORE16LOW RISK
OverviewPeopleConnections 21Risk signals 1Sources

Key facts

active
HGT Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
de
R2103_HRB7783
de
active
de
Berliner Straße 83-85, 33330 Gütersloh.
de

Connections

21 links
Shared operator — likely the same administrator
HGT GmbH & Co. KGShared registered address · 3 share thisMobilo Verwaltungs GmbHShared registered address · 3 share thisEdel Germany GmbHShared officer / director · 5 share thisKai Heitmann GmbHShared officer / director · 5 share thisEdel AGShared officer / director · 5 share thisAT Gastro GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisStanley Security Deutschland GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisBioc Frankfurt Consulting GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisHeitmann Verwaltungs GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisRK Legal Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisdiabetikerbedarf db GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisBDS Verwaltungs GmbHShared officer / director · 9 share thisBeteiligungsgesellschaft Ehlebracht m.b.H.Shared officer / director · 10 share thisH + L Verwaltungs GmbHShared officer / director · 10 share thisHinrich König Gesellschaft mit beschränkter HaftungShared officer / director · 10 share this

A shared address, domain or mail server is a lead, not a verdict — most often the same administrator (accountant / corporate-services provider), not a single group.

Showing 15 of 21 — full graph via /v1/entities/DE-R2103_HRB7783/network.

People with significant control

5 people
NameRoleFromSource
Christian Heitmannofficer—Germany registry
Günter Heitmannofficer—Germany registry
Christian Heitmannsole representation—Germany registry
Günter Heitmannsole representation—Germany registry
Kai Heitmannsole representation—Germany registry

Risk signals

1 matched
high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 10 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

Risk journey — why 16?

1 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
Composite risk score16/100