DOSSIERS / TR GRUNDSTÜCKSVERWALTUNG GMBH
← SearchExport PDF
Company dossier

TR Grundstücksverwaltung GmbH

GERMANY · COMPANY
KYBE ID: DE-R2101_HRB40490 · R2101_HRB40490 · 1 sources
RISK SCORE31MEDIUM RISK
OverviewPeopleConnections 13Risk signals 2Sources

Key facts

active
TR Grundstücksverwaltung GmbH
de
R2101_HRB40490
de
active
de
Tenge-Rietberg-Straße 104, 33758 Schloß Holte-Stukenbrock.
de

Connections

13 links
Shared operator — likely the same administrator
TR Verwaltungs GmbHShared registered address · 5 share thisTR Metall Verwaltungs-GmbHShared registered address · 5 share thisTenge-Rietberg Verwaltungsgesellschaft mit beschränkter HaftungShared registered address · 5 share thistenrit Metall GmbH & Co. OHGShared registered address · 5 share thisTenge-Rietberg Verwaltungsgesellschaft mit beschränkter HaftungShared officer / director · 10 share thisTR Metall Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 10 share thisTENRIT Foodtec Maschinenbau GmbHShared officer / director · 10 share thisHolter Transportbeton GmbH & Co. OHGShared officer / director · 10 share thistenrit Foodtec GmbH & Co. KGShared officer / director · 10 share thistenrit Sanitär GmbH & Co. OHGShared officer / director · 10 share thisTR Verwaltungs GmbHShared officer / director · 10 share thisTR Foodtec Verwaltungs-GmbHShared officer / director · 10 share thistenrit Metall GmbH & Co. OHGShared officer / director · 10 share this

A shared address, domain or mail server is a lead, not a verdict — most often the same administrator (accountant / corporate-services provider), not a single group.

People with significant control

1 people
NameRoleFromSource
Carl-Philipp LinsAuthorized representative—Germany registry

Risk signals

2 matched
high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 10 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

high

Phoenix predecessor

Shares a director with a failed, near-identically-named company (TR Verwaltungs GmbH · dissolved · name-sim 0.48) — phoenixing pattern (shed debts under a new company)

Risk journey — why 31?

2 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
+15
Phoenix predecessor
Composite risk score31/100