DOSSIERS / DIDEROT FINANCEMENT 33
← SearchExport PDF
Partnership dossier

DIDEROT FINANCEMENT 33

FRANCE · PARTNERSHIP · INCORPORATED 2016-12-30
KYBE ID: 96950009VWW2B9WLRL56 · 824665491 · 2 sources
RISK SCORE51HIGH RISK
OverviewOwnershipPeopleRisk signals 4Sources

Key facts

dissolved
DIDEROT FINANCEMENT 33
gleif
824665491
gleif
dissolved
gleif
General partnership (SNC)
gleif
2016-12-30
gleif
33 PL RONDE, IMMEUBLE LE VILLAGE 1, QUARTIER VALMY, 92800 PUTEAUX
gleif
77.34Z
gleif
€1,000
gleif

Ownership structure

1 entities

No ownership links on record for this entity.

Companies at this address

27 total
ADN LOCATIONdissolvedCFTU LOCATIONdissolvedDIDEROT FINANCEMENT 25dissolvedDIDEROT FINANCEMENT 27dissolvedDIDEROT FINANCEMENT 28dissolvedDIDEROT FINANCEMENT 29dissolvedDIDEROT FINANCEMENT 30dissolvedFORT BOURBON 2613 FINANCEMENTactiveFORT DIAMANT 2615 FINANCEMENTactiveHERCO LOCATIONdissolvedINGEPARTICIPATION 1activeINGEPARTICIPATION 2activeLA ROCHE 2017dissolvedLOGIDIS LOCATION 2dissolvedLS 90dissolvedSA PRONY G3 2023dissolvedSAS ABELIAdissolvedSAS ARBOREA 1dissolvedSAS AVISOdissolvedSAS EDT LOCATIONdissolved

+7 more

People with significant control

5 people
NameRoleFromSource
ARNAUD LAOUENANDirigeant—France registry
Caisse d'Epargne CEPACMembre du directoire—France registry
CAISSE D'EPARGNE ET DE PREVOYANCE DE BOURGOGNE FRANCHE-COMTEMembre du directoire—France registry
COFIBRED 8 SASMembre du directoire—France registry
BRED BANQUE POPULAIREPrésident—France registry

Risk signals

4 matched
low

Clustered address

Address shared by 27 companies

medium

Batch-formation cluster

5 companies at this address were incorporated the same day (2016-12-30) — buffer-chain / grant-farm / cartel-field pattern

high

Business fragmentation

A director is shared across 67 companies — business-splitting (дробление) pattern

high

Phoenix predecessor

Shares a director with a failed, near-identically-named company (DIDEROT FINANCEMENT 31 · dissolved · name-sim 0.84) — phoenixing pattern (shed debts under a new company)

Risk journey — why 51?

4 signals
+16
Business fragmentation
+15
Phoenix predecessor
+14
Batch-formation cluster
+6
Clustered address
Composite risk score51/100